Filed: Sep. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-14601 Date Filed: 09/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-14601 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00015-GKS-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO JESUS FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2012) Before HULL, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tom Dale, appointed counsel for
Summary: Case: 11-14601 Date Filed: 09/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-14601 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00015-GKS-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO JESUS FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2012) Before HULL, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Tom Dale, appointed counsel for P..
More
Case: 11-14601 Date Filed: 09/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-14601
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00015-GKS-KRS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO JESUS FLORES,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(September 17, 2012)
Before HULL, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Pedro Jesus Flores in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
Case: 11-14601 Date Filed: 09/17/2012 Page: 2 of
2
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Flores’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2