Filed: Aug. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-14622 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-14622 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00093-JDW-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EUSEBIO BERNARDO-FERNANDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 15, 2012) Before JORDAN, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 11-14622 Date Fil
Summary: Case: 11-14622 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-14622 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00093-JDW-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EUSEBIO BERNARDO-FERNANDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 15, 2012) Before JORDAN, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 11-14622 Date File..
More
Case: 11-14622 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-14622
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00093-JDW-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EUSEBIO BERNARDO-FERNANDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 15, 2012)
Before JORDAN, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 11-14622 Date Filed: 08/15/2012 Page: 2 of 2
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Eusebio Bernardo-Fernando in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bernardo-Fernando’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2