Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Thomas Jerome Johnson, 11-15203 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-15203 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-15203 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-15203 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00061-BAE-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JEROME JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (September 11, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Solomon Amusan, appoint
More
              Case: 11-15203    Date Filed: 09/11/2012   Page: 1 of 2

                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                                No. 11-15203
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00061-BAE-GRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

THOMAS JEROME JOHNSON,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                          Southern District of Georgia
                         _________________________

                               (September 11, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Solomon Amusan, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Johnson in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 87 S.Ct.
              Case: 11-15203    Date Filed: 09/11/2012   Page: 2 of 2

1396, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer