Filed: Sep. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-15203 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-15203 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00061-BAE-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JEROME JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (September 11, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Solomon Amusan, appoint
Summary: Case: 11-15203 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-15203 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00061-BAE-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JEROME JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (September 11, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Solomon Amusan, appointe..
More
Case: 11-15203 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15203
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00061-BAE-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS JEROME JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(September 11, 2012)
Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Solomon Amusan, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Johnson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 11-15203 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2