Filed: Sep. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10543 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00032-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JOHN BACH, II, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 11, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed coun
Summary: Case: 12-10543 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00032-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JOHN BACH, II, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 11, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed couns..
More
Case: 12-10543 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10543
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00032-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS JOHN BACH, II,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 11, 2012)
Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Thomas John Bach, II, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 12-10543 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bach’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2