Filed: Oct. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10551 Date Filed: 10/24/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10551 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00079-MMH-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELMARIO DESHAWN CLAY, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 24, 2012) Before DU
Summary: Case: 12-10551 Date Filed: 10/24/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10551 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00079-MMH-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELMARIO DESHAWN CLAY, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 24, 2012) Before DUB..
More
Case: 12-10551 Date Filed: 10/24/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10551
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00079-MMH-TEM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELMARIO DESHAWN CLAY,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 24, 2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-10551 Date Filed: 10/24/2012 Page: 2 of 2
Ronald W. Maxwell, appointed counsel for Elmario Deshawn Clay in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.
Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clay’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2