Filed: Sep. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10702 Date Filed: 09/20/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10702 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00171-HES-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM TYLER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 20, 2012) Before CARNES, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Stephen A. Mosca, appointed coun
Summary: Case: 12-10702 Date Filed: 09/20/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10702 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00171-HES-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM TYLER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 20, 2012) Before CARNES, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Stephen A. Mosca, appointed couns..
More
Case: 12-10702 Date Filed: 09/20/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10702
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cr-00171-HES-TEM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM TYLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(September 20, 2012)
Before CARNES, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen A. Mosca, appointed counsel for William Tyler in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 12-10702 Date Filed: 09/20/2012 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Tyler’s
supervised release, and his 24-month sentence of imprisonment, are AFFIRMED.
2