Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10717 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10717 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:06-cr-00289-VMC-MCR-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASMINE ALLEN, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 17, 2012) Before TJOFLAT, JOR
Summary: Case: 12-10717 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10717 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:06-cr-00289-VMC-MCR-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASMINE ALLEN, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 17, 2012) Before TJOFLAT, JORD..
More
Case: 12-10717 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10717
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:06-cr-00289-VMC-MCR-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JASMINE ALLEN,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 17, 2012)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-10717 Date Filed: 07/17/2012 Page: 2 of 2
Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Jasmine Allen in this appeal from
the denial of Allen’s motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Allen’s motion is
AFFIRMED.
2