Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ricky Kinward Manning, 12-11912 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-11912 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-11912 Date Filed: 08/30/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-11912 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:03-cr-80039-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICKY KINWARD MANNING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 30, 2012) Before CARNES, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appo
More
            Case: 12-11912   Date Filed: 08/30/2012   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]


             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                             No. 12-11912
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 9:03-cr-80039-DTKH-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,



                                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

RICKY KINWARD MANNING,

                                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (August 30, 2012)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appointed counsel for Ricky Kinward Manning
              Case: 12-11912    Date Filed: 08/30/2012   Page: 2 of 2

in this 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further

representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of

§ 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer