Filed: Jan. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-13645 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13645 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00024-GKS-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, versus DOMINIQUE JUST FIELDS, a.k.a. Dominique Fields, Defendant – Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 10, 2013) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: Case: 11-13645 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13645 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00024-GKS-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, versus DOMINIQUE JUST FIELDS, a.k.a. Dominique Fields, Defendant – Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 10, 2013) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
Case: 11-13645 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13645
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00024-GKS-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
versus
DOMINIQUE JUST FIELDS,
a.k.a. Dominique Fields,
Defendant – Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 10, 2013)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 11-13645 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Dominique Fields in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fields’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2