Elawyers Elawyers

United States v. Dominique Just Fields, 11-13645 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-13645 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-13645 Date Filed: 01/10/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13645 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00024-GKS-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, versus DOMINIQUE JUST FIELDS, a.k.a. Dominique Fields, Defendant – Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 10, 2013) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
More
           Case: 11-13645   Date Filed: 01/10/2013   Page: 1 of 2

                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 11-13645
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00024-GKS-GJK-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                           Plaintiff – Appellee,

                                  versus

DOMINIQUE JUST FIELDS,
a.k.a. Dominique Fields,

                                                        Defendant – Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (January 10, 2013)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 11-13645     Date Filed: 01/10/2013   Page: 2 of 2

      Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Dominique Fields in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
,

87 S. Ct. 1396
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fields’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer