Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Antonio Jones, 11-13883 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-13883 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-13883 Date Filed: 04/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-13883 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00137-JA-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTONIO JONES, a.k.a. PJ, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 9, 2013) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 11-13883 Date F
More
           Case: 11-13883   Date Filed: 04/09/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]

            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 11-13883
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00137-JA-GJK-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                     Plaintiff - Appellee,

                                  versus



ANTONIO JONES,
a.k.a. PJ,

                                                     Defendant - Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (April 9, 2013)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 11-13883     Date Filed: 04/09/2013   Page: 2 of 2


      Roger L. Weeden, counsel for Antonio Jones in this direct criminal appeal,

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967). Our independent

review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Jones’s

convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer