Filed: May 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10765 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10765 _ D.C. Docket No. 6:91-cr-00033-GKS-DAB-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT JACKSON, SR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 20, 2013) Before: BARKETT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges BY THE COURT: Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Robert Jackson
Summary: Case: 12-10765 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10765 _ D.C. Docket No. 6:91-cr-00033-GKS-DAB-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT JACKSON, SR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 20, 2013) Before: BARKETT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges BY THE COURT: Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Robert Jackson,..
More
Case: 12-10765 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10765
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:91-cr-00033-GKS-DAB-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT JACKSON, SR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 20, 2013)
Before: BARKETT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges
BY THE COURT:
Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Robert Jackson, Sr., in this appeal
of the district court’s denial of Jackson’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18
Case: 12-10765 Date Filed: 05/20/2013 Page: 2 of 2
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Jackson’s
§ 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
2