Filed: Mar. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-12295 Date Filed: 03/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12295 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-00049-SLB-RRA-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY JERRELL SMITH, a.k.a. Andre Williams, a.k.a. Andre Woods, a.k.a. Andre Smith, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 5, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERS
Summary: Case: 12-12295 Date Filed: 03/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12295 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-00049-SLB-RRA-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY JERRELL SMITH, a.k.a. Andre Williams, a.k.a. Andre Woods, a.k.a. Andre Smith, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 5, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSO..
More
Case: 12-12295 Date Filed: 03/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12295
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-00049-SLB-RRA-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY JERRELL SMITH,
a.k.a. Andre Williams,
a.k.a. Andre Woods,
a.k.a. Andre Smith,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 5, 2013)
Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
Case: 12-12295 Date Filed: 03/05/2013 Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory J. Reid, counsel for Larry Jerrell Smith in this appeal of the
revocation of Smith’s supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of
the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s
revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2