Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Keslin Joseph, 12-12537 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-12537
Filed: Apr. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-12537 Date Filed: 04/01/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12537 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:12-cr-80003-KLR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KESLIN JOSEPH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (April 1, 2013) Before BARKETT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gary Kollin, appointed counsel for Kes
More
              Case: 12-12537    Date Filed: 04/01/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 12-12537
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                      D.C. Docket No. 9:12-cr-80003-KLR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

KESLIN JOSEPH,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                                  (April 1, 2013)

Before BARKETT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Gary Kollin, appointed counsel for Keslin Joseph in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed

a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 18 L.Ed.2d
              Case: 12-12537     Date Filed: 04/01/2013    Page: 2 of 2


493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Joseph’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

      Nevertheless, because Joseph’s criminal judgment contains two scrivener’s

errors, we issue a LIMITED REMAND for the district court to correct those errors,

which will require the court to (1) alter the description of the offense in Count Two

from “Delivering a firearm for shipment to a common carrier with notice” to

“Delivering a firearm for shipment to a common carrier without notice;” and

(2) correct a typographical error in Count Three, specifically, delete the additional

“t” in the word “the.”




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer