Filed: Oct. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14346 Date Filed: 10/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14346 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-20698-AMS KELLY PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant, LUISA GINSBERG, CRISTINA PARET, YAHILIN CHIRINO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus M.I. QUALITY LAWN MAINTENANCE, INC., MITCHELL'S LAWN MAINTENANCE CORP., ADRIANA J. IGELKO, as guardian for Mitchell Igelko, Defendants - Counter Claimants - Appellees, MITCHELL I
Summary: Case: 12-14346 Date Filed: 10/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14346 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-20698-AMS KELLY PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant, LUISA GINSBERG, CRISTINA PARET, YAHILIN CHIRINO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus M.I. QUALITY LAWN MAINTENANCE, INC., MITCHELL'S LAWN MAINTENANCE CORP., ADRIANA J. IGELKO, as guardian for Mitchell Igelko, Defendants - Counter Claimants - Appellees, MITCHELL IG..
More
Case: 12-14346 Date Filed: 10/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14346
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-20698-AMS
KELLY PHILLIPS,
Plaintiff -
Counter Defendant -
Appellant,
LUISA GINSBERG,
CRISTINA PARET,
YAHILIN CHIRINO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
M.I. QUALITY LAWN MAINTENANCE, INC.,
MITCHELL'S LAWN MAINTENANCE CORP.,
ADRIANA J. IGELKO,
as guardian for Mitchell Igelko,
Defendants -
Counter Claimants -
Appellees,
MITCHELL IGELKO,
Case: 12-14346 Date Filed: 10/18/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Defendant -
Counter Claimant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 18, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and COOGLER, * District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal arises from Appellants’ complaint alleging violations of the
minimum wage, overtime, and retaliation provisions of the Fair Labor Standards
Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201–219. On March 30, 2011, the district court granted
the Appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment on the minimum wage and
retaliation claims, and this appeal followed. 1 After carefully reviewing both
parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the partial grant of
summary judgment entered against the Appellants for the reasons set forth in the
well-reasoned order entered by the district court on March 30, 2011.
AFFIRMED.
*
Honorable L. Scott Coogler, United States District Judge for the Northern District of
Alabama, sitting by designation.
1
After the order granting partial summary judgment, a jury returned a verdict for
Appellees on Appellant’s overtime claims. Although Appellants’ Notice of Appeal purports to
challenge that verdict, their brief makes no corresponding argument. We therefore deem it
waived. See Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.,
385 F.3d 1324, 1330 (11th Cir. 2004).
2