Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Stephen Kozak, 12-14575 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-14575 Visitors: 62
Filed: Nov. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-14575 Date Filed: 11/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14575 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-00121-JES-SPC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEPHEN KOZAK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 19, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for
More
            Case: 12-14575    Date Filed: 11/19/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                        ________________________

                              No. 12-14575
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                        ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-00121-JES-SPC-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

STEPHEN KOZAK,


                                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Florida
                       ________________________

                             (November 19, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Stephen Kozak in this direct criminal
              Case: 12-14575     Date Filed: 11/19/2013   Page: 2 of 2


appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kozak’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer