Filed: Nov. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-14575 Date Filed: 11/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14575 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-00121-JES-SPC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEPHEN KOZAK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 19, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for
Summary: Case: 12-14575 Date Filed: 11/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14575 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-00121-JES-SPC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEPHEN KOZAK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 19, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for ..
More
Case: 12-14575 Date Filed: 11/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14575
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:11-cr-00121-JES-SPC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEPHEN KOZAK,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 19, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Stephen Kozak in this direct criminal
Case: 12-14575 Date Filed: 11/19/2013 Page: 2 of 2
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kozak’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2