Filed: Jul. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-14978 Date Filed: 07/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14978 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00042-RS-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MEREDITH LELANN KING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 30, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel
Summary: Case: 12-14978 Date Filed: 07/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14978 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00042-RS-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MEREDITH LELANN KING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 30, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel ..
More
Case: 12-14978 Date Filed: 07/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14978
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:11-cr-00042-RS-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MEREDITH LELANN KING,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(July 30, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Meredith Lelann King in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Ms.
King and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
Case: 12-14978 Date Filed: 07/30/2013 Page: 2 of 2
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ms. King’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2