Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Robert Paul McRay, 12-15260 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15260 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15260 Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15260 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cr-60148-WJZ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT PAUL MCRAY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 16, 2013) Before BARKETT, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sheryl J. Lowenthal, appointed counsel
More
              Case: 12-15260    Date Filed: 07/16/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-15260
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                      D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cr-60148-WJZ-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

ROBERT PAUL MCRAY,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                                  (July 16, 2013)

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Sheryl J. Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Robert Paul McRay in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
,
              Case: 12-15260    Date Filed: 07/16/2013   Page: 2 of 2


18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McRay’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer