Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Eric Paul Sandberg, 12-15272 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15272 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-15272 Date Filed: 06/27/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15272 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00041-SPM-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC PAUL SANDBERG, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 27, 2013) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel
More
              Case: 12-15272    Date Filed: 06/27/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-15272
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00041-SPM-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

ERIC PAUL SANDBERG,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                        _________________________

                                  (June 27, 2013)

Before MARCUS, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Eric Paul Sandberg in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
              Case: 12-15272    Date Filed: 06/27/2013   Page: 2 of 2


counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sandberg=s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer