Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Celso Guerra, 12-15594 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15594 Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15594 Date Filed: 08/28/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15594 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cr-00035-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CELSO GUERRA, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 28, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: William E. Bubsey, appointed counsel
More
              Case: 12-15594    Date Filed: 08/28/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 12-15594
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cr-00035-RH-CAS-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff - Appellee,

                                      versus

CELSO GUERRA,

                                                            Defendant - Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                (August 28, 2013)

Before HULL, JORDAN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      William E. Bubsey, appointed counsel for Celso Guerra in this appeal, has

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
              Case: 12-15594    Date Filed: 08/28/2013   Page: 2 of 2


pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Guerra’s conviction and sentence in the

instant case are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer