Filed: Jul. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-15980 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15980 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00304-KD-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR V. BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 19, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neil H. Hanley, appointed counsel f
Summary: Case: 12-15980 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15980 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00304-KD-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR V. BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (July 19, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neil H. Hanley, appointed counsel fo..
More
Case: 12-15980 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15980
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00304-KD-N-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDGAR V. BROUSSARD,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(July 19, 2013)
Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Neil H. Hanley, appointed counsel for Edgar V. Broussard in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
Case: 12-15980 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 2 of 2
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Broussard’s revocation and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2