Filed: Jul. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-16075 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16075 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00090-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROLANDO BLAS DE LA ROSA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 19, 2013) Case: 12-16075 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Before CARNES, BARKETT and HILL, Circu
Summary: Case: 12-16075 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16075 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00090-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROLANDO BLAS DE LA ROSA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 19, 2013) Case: 12-16075 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Before CARNES, BARKETT and HILL, Circui..
More
Case: 12-16075 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-16075
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00090-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROLANDO BLAS DE LA ROSA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 19, 2013)
Case: 12-16075 Date Filed: 07/19/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Before CARNES, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Rolando Blas de la Rosa in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and De la Rosa’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2