Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-16209 Date Filed: 07/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16209 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00084-DHB-WLB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GARRETT DELMAR JONES, JR., a.k.a. Straw, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 9, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-1620
Summary: Case: 12-16209 Date Filed: 07/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16209 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00084-DHB-WLB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GARRETT DELMAR JONES, JR., a.k.a. Straw, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 9, 2013) Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-16209..
More
Case: 12-16209 Date Filed: 07/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-16209
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00084-DHB-WLB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GARRETT DELMAR JONES, JR.,
a.k.a. Straw,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(July 9, 2013)
Before HULL, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-16209 Date Filed: 07/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Andrew Magruder, appointed counsel for Garrett Jones, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2