Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-16567 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16567 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00170-JA-GJK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY HENRY, a.k.a Troy P, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 25, 2013) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-16567 Date Fi
Summary: Case: 12-16567 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16567 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00170-JA-GJK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TROY HENRY, a.k.a Troy P, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 25, 2013) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-16567 Date Fil..
More
Case: 12-16567 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-16567
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00170-JA-GJK-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TROY HENRY,
a.k.a Troy P,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(October 25, 2013)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-16567 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Tom Dale, counsel for Troy Henry in this direct criminal appeal, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Henry’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2