Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lorenzo Lee Lewis, 13-10035 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-10035 Visitors: 77
Filed: Jul. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-10035 Date Filed: 07/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10035 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00066-HLA-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LORENZO LEE LEWIS, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 29, 2013) Before MARCUS,
More
               Case: 13-10035      Date Filed: 07/29/2013     Page: 1 of 2


                                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]

                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                          FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                            ________________________

                                   No. 13-10035
                               Non-Argument Calendar
                             ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00066-HLA-JBT-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

                                                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

LORENZO LEE LEWIS, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

                                                                 Defendant-Appellant.
                             ________________________

                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Middle District of Florida
                           ________________________

                                     (July 29, 2013)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

       Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Lorenzo Lee Lewis, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
              Case: 13-10035    Date Filed: 07/29/2013   Page: 2 of 2


and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lewis’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer