Filed: Dec. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10187 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10187 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00006-CAP-JFK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON JAMES EYER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (December 2, 2013) Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lawrence J. Zimmerman, appointed counsel for Jason Jame
Summary: Case: 13-10187 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10187 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00006-CAP-JFK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON JAMES EYER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (December 2, 2013) Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lawrence J. Zimmerman, appointed counsel for Jason James..
More
Case: 13-10187 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10187
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00006-CAP-JFK-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JASON JAMES EYER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(December 2, 2013)
Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence J. Zimmerman, appointed counsel for Jason James Eyer in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 13-10187 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eyer’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2