Filed: Dec. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10319 Date Filed: 12/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10319 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00154-CG-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WARREN JAMES LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (December 18, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: William Gregory Hughes, appoint
Summary: Case: 13-10319 Date Filed: 12/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10319 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00154-CG-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WARREN JAMES LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (December 18, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: William Gregory Hughes, appointe..
More
Case: 13-10319 Date Filed: 12/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10319
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00154-CG-N-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WARREN JAMES LEWIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(December 18, 2013)
Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Warren Lewis in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
Case: 13-10319 Date Filed: 12/18/2013 Page: 2 of 2
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lewis’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2