Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lavone Denise Johnson, 13-10402 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-10402 Visitors: 46
Filed: Sep. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-10402 Date Filed: 09/26/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10402 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00526-EAK-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LAVONE DENISE JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 26, 2013) Before MARCUS, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Walter Grantham, appointed coun
More
               Case: 13-10402    Date Filed: 09/26/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 13-10402
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00526-EAK-AEP-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

      versus

LAVONE DENISE JOHNSON,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                (September 26, 2013)

Before MARCUS, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Walter Grantham, appointed counsel for Lavone Denise Johnson in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
              Case: 13-10402     Date Filed: 09/26/2013   Page: 2 of 2


appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer