Filed: Aug. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-10572 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10572 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00132-ACC-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC SLEDGE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 29, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for
Summary: Case: 13-10572 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10572 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00132-ACC-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC SLEDGE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 29, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for ..
More
Case: 13-10572 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10572
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00132-ACC-TBS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERIC SLEDGE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 29, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Eric Sledge in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 13-10572 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 2 of 2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sledge’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2