Filed: Aug. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-10649 Date Filed: 08/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10649 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00235-RWS-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NORMAN URIAH SIMMONDS, a.k.a. Naquan Powell, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 21, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case
Summary: Case: 13-10649 Date Filed: 08/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10649 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00235-RWS-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NORMAN URIAH SIMMONDS, a.k.a. Naquan Powell, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 21, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case:..
More
Case: 13-10649 Date Filed: 08/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10649
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00235-RWS-LTW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NORMAN URIAH SIMMONDS,
a.k.a. Naquan Powell,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(August 21, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-10649 Date Filed: 08/21/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Thomas Wooldridge, appointed appellate counsel for Norman Simmonds in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the defendant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Simmonds’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2