Filed: Dec. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10832 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10832 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00188-ACC-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL C. LORENZ, III, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 6, 2013) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James W. Smith III, appointed cou
Summary: Case: 13-10832 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10832 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00188-ACC-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL C. LORENZ, III, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 6, 2013) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James W. Smith III, appointed coun..
More
Case: 13-10832 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10832
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00188-ACC-DAB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PAUL C. LORENZ, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(December 6, 2013)
Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James W. Smith III, appointed counsel for Paul Lorenz III in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s
Case: 13-10832 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 2 of 2
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lorenz=s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2