Filed: Dec. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11316 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11316 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00005-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CECIL DEWITT NELSON, a.k.a. Red, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (December 2, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: David M. Burns,
Summary: Case: 13-11316 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11316 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00005-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CECIL DEWITT NELSON, a.k.a. Red, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (December 2, 2013) Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: David M. Burns, J..
More
Case: 13-11316 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-11316
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00005-BAE-GRS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CECIL DEWITT NELSON,
a.k.a. Red,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(December 2, 2013)
Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David M. Burns, Jr., appointed counsel for Cecil Dewitt Nelson, has filed a
Case: 13-11316 Date Filed: 12/02/2013 Page: 2 of 2
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2