Filed: Oct. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-11543 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00067-VMC-AEP-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM JOSEPH CALIFANO, a.k.a. Billy, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 21, 2013) Before WILSON, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. Case: 13-11543 Date Fil
Summary: Case: 13-11543 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00067-VMC-AEP-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM JOSEPH CALIFANO, a.k.a. Billy, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 21, 2013) Before WILSON, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. Case: 13-11543 Date File..
More
Case: 13-11543 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-11543
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00067-VMC-AEP-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM JOSEPH CALIFANO,
a.k.a. Billy,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 21, 2013)
Before WILSON, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Case: 13-11543 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Johnson, counsel for William Joseph Califano, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED,
and Califano’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2