Filed: Dec. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10414 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 13-10414; 13-10420 1 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket Nos. 1:11-cr-00301-WHB-LTW-1, 1:10-cr-00276-WBH-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSEPH DOMENIC FLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (December 13, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judg
Summary: Case: 13-10414 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 13-10414; 13-10420 1 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket Nos. 1:11-cr-00301-WHB-LTW-1, 1:10-cr-00276-WBH-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSEPH DOMENIC FLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (December 13, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judge..
More
Case: 13-10414 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
Nos. 13-10414; 13-10420 1
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 1:11-cr-00301-WHB-LTW-1,
1:10-cr-00276-WBH-LTW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH DOMENIC FLOWERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(December 13, 2013)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
These cases were consolidated on appeal.
Case: 13-10414 Date Filed: 12/13/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Mary Erickson, counsel for Joseph Flowers, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Flowers’ convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2