Filed: Jan. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-10746 Date Filed: 01/15/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10746 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00033-EAK-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES MAROVSKIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 15, 2014) Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Daniel M. Hernandez, appointed coun
Summary: Case: 12-10746 Date Filed: 01/15/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10746 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00033-EAK-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES MAROVSKIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 15, 2014) Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Daniel M. Hernandez, appointed couns..
More
Case: 12-10746 Date Filed: 01/15/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10746
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00033-EAK-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES MAROVSKIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 15, 2014)
Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel M. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Charles Marovskis in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Marovskis
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
Case: 12-10746 Date Filed: 01/15/2014 Page: 2 of
2
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Marovskis’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2