Filed: Jan. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-13620 Date Filed: 01/06/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-13620 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00467-EAK-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRUCE KENYON DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 6, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-13620 Date Filed: 01/06
Summary: Case: 12-13620 Date Filed: 01/06/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-13620 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00467-EAK-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRUCE KENYON DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 6, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-13620 Date Filed: 01/06/..
More
Case: 12-13620 Date Filed: 01/06/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-13620
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00467-EAK-MAP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRUCE KENYON DAVIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 6, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-13620 Date Filed: 01/06/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Mark Ciaravella, appointed counsel for Bruce Davis in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Davis’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2