Filed: Mar. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-16403 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16403 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00003-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUSTIN DANIEL, a.k.a. J Rock, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-16403 Date Fi
Summary: Case: 12-16403 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16403 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00003-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUSTIN DANIEL, a.k.a. J Rock, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-16403 Date Fil..
More
Case: 12-16403 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-16403
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00003-CAR-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUSTIN DANIEL,
a.k.a. J Rock,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(March 5, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-16403 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Martin Vogelbaum, counsel for Justin Daniel, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Daniel’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2