Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Justin Daniel, 12-16403 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-16403 Visitors: 121
Filed: Mar. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-16403 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16403 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00003-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUSTIN DANIEL, a.k.a. J Rock, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-16403 Date Fi
More
           Case: 12-16403    Date Filed: 03/05/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                      [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                        ________________________

                              No. 12-16403
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                        ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00003-CAR-CHW-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

JUSTIN DANIEL,
a.k.a. J Rock,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Middle District of Georgia
                       ________________________

                               (March 5, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 12-16403     Date Filed: 03/05/2014    Page: 2 of 2


      Martin Vogelbaum, counsel for Justin Daniel, has moved to withdraw from

further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Daniel’s

convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer