Filed: Feb. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-16562 Date Filed: 02/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16562 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80156-DTKH-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAMUEL TURNER, a.k.a. Jab, a.k.a. Jabba Jaw, a.k.a. Big Man, Defendant-Appellant. _ No. 12-16563 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80097-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus Case: 12-16562 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 12-16562 Date Filed: 02/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-16562 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80156-DTKH-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAMUEL TURNER, a.k.a. Jab, a.k.a. Jabba Jaw, a.k.a. Big Man, Defendant-Appellant. _ No. 12-16563 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80097-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus Case: 12-16562 Date Filed: 0..
More
Case: 12-16562 Date Filed: 02/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-16562
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80156-DTKH-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SAMUEL TURNER,
a.k.a. Jab,
a.k.a. Jabba Jaw,
a.k.a. Big Man,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
No. 12-16563
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80097-DTKH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
Case: 12-16562 Date Filed: 02/19/2014 Page: 2 of 2
SAMUEL LEE TURNER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(February 19, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Peter T. Patanzo, appointed counsel for Samuel Turner in these direct
criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Turner’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2