Filed: Mar. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10029 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10029 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00062-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELVIN ORLANDO GUERRERO-MARADIAGA, a.k.a. Elvin Orlando Guerrero-Marodiaga, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (March 4, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circui
Summary: Case: 13-10029 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10029 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00062-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ELVIN ORLANDO GUERRERO-MARADIAGA, a.k.a. Elvin Orlando Guerrero-Marodiaga, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (March 4, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit..
More
Case: 13-10029 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10029
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00062-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELVIN ORLANDO GUERRERO-MARADIAGA,
a.k.a. Elvin Orlando Guerrero-Marodiaga,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(March 4, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-10029 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Robert Augustus Harper, III, appointed counsel for Elvin Orlando
Guerrero-Maradiaga in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Guerrero-Maradiaga’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2