Filed: Mar. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10072 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10072 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00008-HL-TQL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EARL WILCOX, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 4, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-10072 Date Filed: 03/04/201
Summary: Case: 13-10072 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10072 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00008-HL-TQL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EARL WILCOX, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (March 4, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-10072 Date Filed: 03/04/2014..
More
Case: 13-10072 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10072
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00008-HL-TQL-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EARL WILCOX, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(March 4, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-10072 Date Filed: 03/04/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Joseph D. Weathers, appointed counsel for Earl Wilcox, Jr. in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilcox’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2