Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10823 Date Filed: 12/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10823 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00487-SCB-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGINALD CHARLES SMILEY, a.k.a. Reginald Charles Smiley, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 30, 2014) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 13-10823 Date Filed: 12/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10823 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00487-SCB-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGINALD CHARLES SMILEY, a.k.a. Reginald Charles Smiley, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 30, 2014) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. ..
More
Case: 13-10823 Date Filed: 12/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10823
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00487-SCB-TBM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROGINALD CHARLES SMILEY,
a.k.a. Reginald Charles Smiley,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 30, 2014)
Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-10823 Date Filed: 12/30/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Mark W. Ciaravella, appointed counsel for Roginald Charles Smiley in this
direct criminal appeal, has filed a renewed motion to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant, supported by a brief filed pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Because our
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smiley’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2