Filed: Apr. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11254 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-20412-JAL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OBER MERINO CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (April 16, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/20
Summary: Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11254 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-20412-JAL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OBER MERINO CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (April 16, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/201..
More
Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-11254
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-20412-JAL-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OBER MERINO CRUZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(April 16, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Ober Merino Cruz in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cruz’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2