Filed: Mar. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11815 Date Filed: 03/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11815 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02326-CAP CHRIST LIBERTY FAMILY LIFE CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF AVONDALE ESTATES, GEORGIA, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 11, 2014) Before WILSON, Circuit Judge, MIDDLEBROOKS* and ALBRITTON**, District Judges. * Honorable Donald
Summary: Case: 13-11815 Date Filed: 03/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11815 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02326-CAP CHRIST LIBERTY FAMILY LIFE CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF AVONDALE ESTATES, GEORGIA, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 11, 2014) Before WILSON, Circuit Judge, MIDDLEBROOKS* and ALBRITTON**, District Judges. * Honorable Donald M..
More
Case: 13-11815 Date Filed: 03/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
___________________________
No. 13-11815
____________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02326-CAP
CHRIST LIBERTY FAMILY LIFE CENTER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF AVONDALE ESTATES, GEORGIA,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_____________________________
(March 11, 2014)
Before WILSON, Circuit Judge, MIDDLEBROOKS* and ALBRITTON**,
District Judges.
* Honorable Donald M. Middlebrooks, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Florida, sitting by designation.
** Honorable W. Harold Albritton, United States District Judge for the Middle District of
Alabama, sitting by designation.
Case: 13-11815 Date Filed: 03/11/2014 Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Christ Liberty Family Life Center appeals the district court’s award, pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, of attorneys’ fees and costs. After reviewing and considering
the briefs and record, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in the award of attorneys’ fees and costs.
Therefore, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
2