Filed: Mar. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12465 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12465 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00295-CLS-JEO-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAVORIS ANDRE TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 5, 2014) Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Case: 13-12465 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 13-12465 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12465 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00295-CLS-JEO-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAVORIS ANDRE TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (March 5, 2014) Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Case: 13-12465 Date Filed: 0..
More
Case: 13-12465 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12465
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00295-CLS-JEO-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TAVORIS ANDRE TAYLOR,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 5, 2014)
Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-12465 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Brett L. Wadsworth, counsel for Tavoris Andre Taylor in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2