Filed: Feb. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13371 Date Filed: 02/24/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13371 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00235-RBD-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELLE WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 24, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13371 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 13-13371 Date Filed: 02/24/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13371 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00235-RBD-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELLE WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 24, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13371 Date Filed: 0..
More
Case: 13-13371 Date Filed: 02/24/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13371
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00235-RBD-DAB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCELLE WHITFIELD,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(February 24, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-13371 Date Filed: 02/24/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Rosemary Cakmis, counsel for Marcelle Whitfield in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Whitfield’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2