Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. David T. Conner, 13-13495 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13495 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13495 Date Filed: 04/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13495 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00055-JRH-BKE-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID T. CONNER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (April 3, 2014) Before WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13495 Date Filed: 04/03/2
More
           Case: 13-13495   Date Filed: 04/03/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 13-13495
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00055-JRH-BKE-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

DAVID T. CONNER,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Georgia
                      ________________________

                              (April 3, 2014)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-13495     Date Filed: 04/03/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Andrew Magruder, appointed counsel for David T. Conner in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Conner’s conviction and

sentence is AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer