Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13525 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13525 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00301-MMH-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK BLACKWOOD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 29, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed
Summary: Case: 13-13525 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13525 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00301-MMH-TEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK BLACKWOOD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 29, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed c..
More
Case: 13-13525 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13525
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00301-MMH-TEM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PATRICK BLACKWOOD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 29, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Patrick Blackwood in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a renewed motion to withdraw from further
Case: 13-13525 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 Page: 2 of 2
representation of the appellant, supported by a brief filed pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Blackwood’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2