Filed: May 06, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13688 Date Filed: 05/06/2014 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13688 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 12-61289 In Re: LYNETTE DAIS MALONE, Debtor. _ WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LYNETTE DAIS MALONE, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (May 6, 2014) Case: 13-13688 Date Filed: 05/06/2014 Page: 2 of 3
Summary: Case: 13-13688 Date Filed: 05/06/2014 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13688 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 12-61289 In Re: LYNETTE DAIS MALONE, Debtor. _ WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LYNETTE DAIS MALONE, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (May 6, 2014) Case: 13-13688 Date Filed: 05/06/2014 Page: 2 of 3 ..
More
Case: 13-13688 Date Filed: 05/06/2014 Page: 1 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13688
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 12-61289
In Re: LYNETTE DAIS MALONE,
Debtor.
___________________________________________________
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LYNETTE DAIS MALONE,
Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(May 6, 2014)
Case: 13-13688 Date Filed: 05/06/2014 Page: 2 of 3
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Wilmington Trust appeals the bankruptcy court’s order in a Chapter 7
bankruptcy proceeding that allowed Lynette Malone to “strip off” Wilmington
Trust’s second-priority lien. After review of the record and Wilmington Trust’s
brief, we affirm. 1
Ms. Malone has two mortgage liens on her house. The first has an
outstanding balance that exceeds the house’s current value, while the second, at
issue in this case and held by Wilmington Trust, is junior to the first lien.
Wilmington Trust’s lien is considered to be wholly “underwater” in that the debt
secured by the first lien exceeds the current value of the house. Accordingly, Ms.
Malone moved to have Wilmington Trust’s junior lien extinguished under § 506(d)
of the Bankruptcy Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 506(d). Notwithstanding certain stated
reservations, the bankruptcy court granted Ms. Malone’s motion, concluding that
binding circuit precedent holds that § 506(d) authorizes a Chapter 7 debtor to “strip
off,” i.e. remove in its entirety, a junior lien where the amount of debt securing the
senior lien exceeds the value of the house. See McNeal v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
(In re McNeal),
735 F.3d 1263, 1266 (11th Cir. 2012); Folendore v. SBA (In re
Folendore),
862 F.2d 1537, 1539 (11th Cir. 1989). The bankruptcy court granted
1
Ms. Malone filed no answer brief in this appeal.
2
Case: 13-13688 Date Filed: 05/06/2014 Page: 3 of 3
the parties’ joint motion to certify its order for direct appeal under 28 U.S.C. §
158(d)(2)(A) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8001(f).
Wilmington Trust argues that the Supreme Court’s intervening opinion in
Dewsnup v. Timm,
502 U.S. 410 (1992), abrogated our construction of § 506(d) as
set forth in Folendore, and that we therefore should re-visit this issue. As
Wilmington Trust also acknowledges, however, we recently rejected that very
argument in McNeal, concluding that Dewsnup was not clearly on point because
it disallowed only a “strip down” of a partially secured mortgage lien, rather than a
“strip off” of a wholly unsecured mortgage lien, and thus did not abrogate
Folendore. See
McNeal, 735 F.3d at 1265-66.
Because we are bound to follow our prior published decisions in Folendore
and McNeal, we affirm the bankruptcy court’s decision voiding Wilmington
Trust’s lien on Ms. Malone’s house. 2
AFFIRMED.
2
By separate order, Wilmington Trust’s petition for initial hearing en banc has been
denied. Wilmington Trust remains free, of course, to seek rehearing en banc of this panel’s
decision.
3