Filed: Apr. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13774 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13774 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00557-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE RAUL MACEDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 29, 2014) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel f
Summary: Case: 13-13774 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13774 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00557-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE RAUL MACEDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 29, 2014) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel fo..
More
Case: 13-13774 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13774
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00557-JSM-TGW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE RAUL MACEDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(April 29, 2014)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Jose Macedo in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
Case: 13-13774 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 2 of 2
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Macedo=s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2