Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jose Raul Macedo, 13-13774 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13774 Visitors: 74
Filed: Apr. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13774 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13774 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00557-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE RAUL MACEDO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 29, 2014) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel f
More
              Case: 13-13774    Date Filed: 04/29/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 13-13774
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00557-JSM-TGW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

JOSE RAUL MACEDO,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                        _________________________

                                  (April 29, 2014)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Jose Macedo in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
              Case: 13-13774    Date Filed: 04/29/2014   Page: 2 of 2


counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Macedo=s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer