Filed: Jun. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13789 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13789 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00032-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEANDRA LORON DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 23, 2014) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard A. Greenberg, appointed co
Summary: Case: 13-13789 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13789 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00032-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEANDRA LORON DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 23, 2014) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard A. Greenberg, appointed cou..
More
Case: 13-13789 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
_____________________________
No. 13-13789
Non-Argument Calendar
_____________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00032-RH-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DEANDRA LORON DAVIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_____________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_____________________________
(June 23, 2014)
Before WILSON, JORDAN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Greenberg, appointed counsel for Deandra Loron Davis in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 13-13789 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Davis’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2