Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Richard Tucker, 13-14135 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-14135 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14135 Date Filed: 07/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14135 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00030-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 17, 2014) Before WILSON, PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14135 Date Filed: 07/17/
More
           Case: 13-14135   Date Filed: 07/17/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 13-14135
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00030-RH-CAS-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

RICHARD TUCKER,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (July 17, 2014)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-14135     Date Filed: 07/17/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Chet Kaufman, on behalf of Randolph Murrell, appointed counsel for

Richard Tucker, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Tucker’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer